Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd vs State of Kerala 2026 INSC 4 -Arbitration Act
You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register by clicking here:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 21- The object is only for the purpose of commencement of arbitral proceedings is also well settled. Section 21 is concerned only with determining the commencement of the dispute for the purpose of reckoning limitation. There is no mandatory prerequisite for issuance of a Section 21 notice prior to the commencement of Arbitration. Issuance of a Section 21 notice may come to the aid of parties and the arbitrator in determining the limitation for the claim. Failure to issue a Section 21 notice would not be fatal to a party in Arbitration if the claim is otherwise valid and the disputes arbitrable. (Para 16)
Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 23 - Once the Arbitral Tribunal is constituted claims, defence and, counter claims are filed. Party which normally files the claim first is, for convenience, referred to as the ‘claimant’ and the party which responds is called the Page 40 of 41 ‘respondent’. The said respondent is also along with the defence statement entitled to file its counter claim. Hence, to contend that the appellant cannot be referred to as a claimant because no notice under Section 21 has been issued is completely untenable. (Para 20)
Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 7- Arbitration Agreement - If an arbitration agreement provides that all disputes between the parties relating to the contract shall be referred to arbitration, the reference contemplated is the act of parties to the arbitration agreement. (Para 18)
Case Info
Case Details
- Case name: M/s Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd. v. State of Kerala.
- Neutral citation: 2026 INSC 4.
- Coram: J. B. Pardiwala, J. and K. V. Viswanathan, J.
- Judgment date: 5 January 2026.
Caselaws and Citations
- State of Goa v. Praveen Enterprises, (2012) 12 SCC 581.
- M.K. Shah Engineers & Contractors v. State of M.P., (1999) 2 SCC 594.
- Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Amritsar Gas Service, (1991) 1 SCC 533.
- Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. Tiwari Road Lines, (2007) 5 SCC 703.
- MSK Projects India (JV) Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan, (2011) 10 SCC 573.
- ASF Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Ltd., (2025) 9 SCC 76.
- Adavya Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Vishal Structurals Pvt. Ltd., (2025) 9 SCC 686.
Statutes/Laws Referred
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:
- Section 2(9)
- Section 4
- Section 11(2)
- Section 16
- Section 21
- Section 23(1), 23(2A), 23(3)
- Section 28(3)
- Section 32(2)(a) (referenced via Section 2(9) exclusion)
- Section 34
- Section 37
- Indian Contract Act, 1872:
- Section 28(b) (as referenced by High Court’s finding)
- DIAC Arbitration Proceedings Rules, 2018:
- Rule 2.1(g) (definitions of “Claimant”, “Respondent”, “Counter-Claimant”)
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court judgment and upheld the arbitral award dated 29.06.2006 in full.
