K. Kirubakaran vs State of Tamil Nadu 2025 INSC 1272 - POCSO Case Quashed - Accused & Victim Married
Constitution of India - Article 142 - While quashing criminal proceedings against POCSO Accused, SC observed: The appellant and the victim are not only legally married, they are also in their family way. While considering the offence committed by the appellant punishable under the POCSO Act, we have discerned that the crime was not the result of lust but love. The victim of crime herself has expressed her desire to live a peaceful and stable family life with the appellant, upon whom she is dependent, without the appellant carrying the indelible mark on his forehead of being an offender. Continuation of the criminal proceedings and the appellant’s incarceration would only disrupt this familial unit and cause irreparable harm to the victim, the infant child, and the fabric of society itself - this is a case where the law must yield to the cause of justice. (Para 9-10)
Criminal Law - A crime is not merely a wrong against an individual but against society as a whole. When an offence is committed, it wounds the collective conscience of the society and therefore the society, acting through its elected lawmakers, determines what would be the punishment for such an offence and how an offender should be dealt with, to deter its recurrence. The criminal law is, thus, a manifestation of the sovereign will of the society. However, the administration of such law is not divorced from the practical realities. Rendering justice demands a nuanced approach. This Court tailors its decisions to the specifics of each case: with firmness and severity wherever necessary and it is merciful when warranted. It is also in the best interest of society to bring a dispute to an end, wherever possible- The law aims to ensure not just punishment of the guilty, but also harmony and restoration of the social order. (Para 6)
Constitution of India - Article 142- The founding fathers of the Constitution conferred this Court with the extraordinary power to do “complete justice” in proper cases. This constitutional power stands apart from all other powers and is intended to avoid situations of injustice being caused by the rigid application of law. (Para 8)
Case Info
Case Details
- Case name: K. Kirubakaran vs State of Tamil Nadu.
- Neutral citation: 2025 INSC 1272.
- Coram: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Augustine George Masih.
- Judgment date: October 28, 2025, New Delhi.
Caselaws and citations
- Benjamin N. Cardozo quote referenced; no specific Indian case precedents cited in the text.
- The Court invokes Article 142 jurisprudence (complete justice) but does not list prior authorities.
Statutes / laws referred
- Indian Penal Code, 1872: Section 366.
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO): Section 6.
- Constitution of India: Article 142 (complete justice).
- Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA): involvement noted via Court’s order dated February 6, 2024.
“The crime was not the result of lust but love…The law must yield to the cause of justice.."
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) October 30, 2025
A man was convicted in a POCSO case. After conviction, victim married him.
Before #SupremeCourt, she submitted that they now have a kid and are leading a happy married life.
SC then… https://t.co/6GArA1OT4N pic.twitter.com/ceLKJcpg3D
The criminal law is a manifestation of the sovereign will of the society. However, the administration of such law is not divorced from the practical realities. Rendering justice demands a nuanced approach.#SupremeCourtofIndia https://t.co/6GArA1OT4N pic.twitter.com/r4iyNGrBol
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) October 30, 2025

