Savita v. Satyabhan Dixit - High Courts - Courts Of Record
Constitution of India - Article 215 - High Courts in India are the Courts of record and what is recorded in the Courts are correct and cannot be contradicted by the counsel for the parties. [Context: SC was addressing the contention thatthat the statement/concession made by the petitioner/defendant’s counsel was wholly unauthorised and contrary to her instructions]
Case Info
Key Details
- Case name: Savita v. Satyabhan Dixit.
- Neutral citation: Not provided in the document.
- Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan; Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria.
- Judgment/order date: 07-11-2025 (Supreme Court order disposing the SLP).
- Impugned judgment date: 15-09-2025 (High Court of Judicature at Allahabad).
Caselaws and Citations
- State of Maharashtra v. Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak & Anr., (1982) 2 SCC 463.Cited for the principle that High Courts, being courts of record, have accurate proceedings and recorded statements cannot be contradicted later.
The High Courts in India are the Courts of record and what is recorded in the Courts are correct and cannot be contradicted by the counsel for the parties.#SupremeCourtofIndia https://t.co/EQsLzsW1eK pic.twitter.com/VzLXIJKah0
— CiteCase 🇮🇳 (@CiteCase) November 12, 2025