Disciplinary Proceedings - CaseCiter (Page 2)

CaseCiter

Sign in Subscribe

Disciplinary Proceedings

A collection of 34 posts

Article 226 Constitution - Disciplinary Proceedingss

Maharana Pratap Singh vs State Of Bihar 2025 INSC 554 - Disciplinary Proceedings

Disciplinary Proceedings - If there is a flaw from the inception of the disciplinary proceedings, i.e., the charge-sheet is not issued conforming to the relevant rules and the charged officer finds it difficult to meet the charges because it is vague, indefinite, not specific and lacking in material particulars,

Disciplinary Proceedings

Durga Prasad vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi 2025 INSC 548 - Disciplinary Proceedings

Disciplinary Proceedings - In the event of disagreement, Disciplinary authority has to give brief reasons for his disagreement with inquiry officer and provide an opportunity to the employee to respond to such disagreement note before forming its own opinion with regard to imposition of punishment on the delinquent. (Para 18)

Disciplinary Proceedings

Amresh Shrivastava vs State Of Madhya Pradesh 2025 INSC 417- Disciplinary Proceedings

Disciplinary Proceedings - Delay - Whether delay is a ground for stopping the departmental proceedings at the stage of the chargesheet itself, suffice it to say that this varies from case to case - Where there is unexplained inordinate delay in initiating departmental proceedings despite the alleged misconduct being within

Director Marketing Of Agricultural vs D. Khasim Saheb - Disciplinary Proceedings - Reinstatement - Acquittal

Disciplinary proceedings - Merely because the employee has been acquitted by a Criminal Court that alone would not result in his reinstatement in service when he has been dismissed from service after a departmental proceeding. This is for the simple reason that the standard of proof and the appreciation of

Airports Authority Of India vs Pradip Kumar Banerjee 2025 INSC 149 - Disciplinary Proceedings - Art. 226 Constitution - Intra Court Writ Appeal

Disciplinary proceedings -In disciplinary proceedings, it is not necessary for the Disciplinary Authority to deal with each and every ground raised by the delinquent officer in the representation against the proposed penalty and detailed reasons are not required to be recorded in the order imposing punishment if he accepts the

Disciplinary Proceedings

General Manager Personnel Syndicate Bank vs BSN Prasad 2025 INSC 89 - Disciplinary Proceedings - Bank Officials- Judicial Review

Disciplinary Proceedings - An acquittal in a criminal case is no ground to exonerate a delinquent in disciplinary proceedings as the standard of proof differs in these proceeding- (Para 16) the exercise of powers by the disciplinary authority is always subject to principles of proportionality and fair play. (Para 23)

Disciplinary Proceedings

Bhupinderpal Singh Gill Vs State Of Punjab 2025 INSC 83 - Constitutional Courts - Judicial Review Of Disciplinary Proceedings - Natural Justice

Practice and Procedure - Constitutional Courts - Issuing limited notice at the stage of admission does not bar a Constitutional Court having inherent powers to pass such orders as the justice of the case before it demands to enlarge the scope of a petition/appeal at the stage of final

Disciplinary Proceedings

State Bank Of India vs Navin Kumar Sinha 2024 INSC 874 - Disciplinary Proceedings

Disciplinary Proceedings - A departmental proceeding is not initiated merely on issuance of a show cause notice. It is initiated only when a chargesheet is issued because that is the date of application of mind on the allegations levelled against an employee by the competent authority- A subsisting disciplinary proceeding

Disciplinary Proceedings

Satyendra Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh 2024 INSC 873 - Disciplinary Proceedings - Ex-Party Inquiry

Disciplinary Proceedings - Recording of evidence in a disciplinary proceeding proposing charges of a major punishment is mandatory- Even in an ex-parte inquiry, it is sine qua non to record the evidence of the witnesses for proving the charges- mere production of documents is not enough, contents of documentary evidence