Public Appointments - CaseCiter

CaseCiter

Sign in

Public Appointments

A collection of 13 posts

Public Appointments

Laxmikant Sharma vs State Of Madhya Pradesh 2025 INSC 1385 - Public Employment - Equivalence - Qualification

Read Judgment In LawLens Constitution of India - Article 14, 226 -Public Employment - The question whether a particular qualification is “equivalent” to the one prescribed is primarily for the employer or the expert body to decide and that the Court, in exercise of judicial review, does not ordinarily sit

Public Appointments

Sanjay Kumar Mishra & Ors. v. District Judge, Ambedkar Nagar 2025 INSC 1252 - Public Appointments

Public Appointments -Supreme Court set aside the 2008 termination of four Class IV employees, ordering limited relief and observed: recital in the advertisement would clearly indicate that the Appointing Authority intended that a wait list be maintained so as to fill up the vacancies arising in excess of those notified,

Public Appointments

Union of India vs Subit Kumar Das 2025 INSC 1235 - Wait List - Concession Made By Counsel On Question Of Law

Public Appointment - Recruitment -Mere placement in the wait list does not create any vested right for being so appointed. The right to be considered for appointment would spring only in the contingency of a selected candidate not joining on his post. The wait list operates for a limited period.

Public Appointments

Ravi Oraon vs State of Jharkhand 2025 INSC 1212 - Jharkhand Primary School Teacher Appointment Rules- Natural Justice

Jharkhand Primary School Teacher Appointment Rules, 2012 - Rule 4,21- The procedure that Rule 21 enshrined is only to be used for the purpose of preparation of merit list and Rule 4 does not provide for exclusion of marks secured in the vocational subject (Para 36) - Marks secured

Public Appointments

Irwan Kour vs Punjab Public Service Commission 2025 INSC 494 -Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Servicemen Rules - Indian Military Nursing Service

Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Servicemen Rules, 1982 - No reason to exclude Indian Military Nursing Service (IMNS) personnel from the category of “ex-servicemen”. (Para 18) 2025 INSC 494 Irwan Kour vs Punjab Public Service Commission -Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Servicemen Rules - Indian Military Nursing Service2025 INSC 494 Irwan Kour vs Punjab

Public Appointments

Prabhjot Kaur vs State Of Punjab 2025 INSC 479 - Public Appointments

Public Appointments - Recruitment - The State or its instrumentalities cannot tinker with the ‘rules of the game’ once the recruitment process commences - Referred to Tej Prakash Pathak v. High Court of Rajasthan, (2025) 2 SCC 1. (Para 22) 2025 INSC 479 Prabhjot Kaur vs State Of Punjab -

Public Appointments

Sakshi Arha vs Rajasthan High Court 2025 INSC 463 - Public Employment -Eligibility Criteria

Public Employment -The claim made by a candidate while filling his or her application as per the concerned advertisement are to hold good as on the date of his or her application or as per the last date of submission of applications prescribed by the concerned advertisement. (Para 34) The

Public Appointments

Soumen Paul vs Shrabani Nayek 2025 INSC 451 - Public Employment - Eligibility

Public Employment - The candidate seeking public employment must satisfy his eligibility requirements in terms of the date appointed by the relevant service rules and, “if there is no cut-off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose of advertisement calling for applications”

Constitutional Law

Bihar Rajya Dafadar Chaukidar Panchayat (Magadh Division) vs State Of Bihar - Subordinate Legislation - Unconstitutionality - Public Employment

Constitution of India - Article 32,226 - Subordinate Legislation - A writ court, when it finds its conscience to be pricked in a rare and very exceptional case by the patent unconstitutionality of a subordinate legislation connected with the issue it is seized of, may, upon grant of full

Public Appointments

State Of West Bengal VS Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (Chatterjee) 2025 INSC 437 - Public Employment - Selection Process - Fraud

Public Employment - Selection Process - When an in-depth factual inquiry reveals systemic irregularities, such as malaise or fraud, that undermine the integrity of the entire selection process, the result should be cancelled in its entirety. However, if and when possible, segregation of tainted and untainted candidates should be done

Public Appointments

State Of Assam vs Arabinda Rabha 2025 INSC 334 - Public Employment

Public Employment - Empanelled/selected candidate can claim no right of appointment, if the State has cogent and germane grounds for not making the appointment. However, at the same time, it is also the law that the appointing authority cannot ignore the select panel or decline to make the appointment

Sajid Khan vs L Rahmathullah 2025 INSC 251 - Equivalence - Recruitment Matters

Public Appointments - Equivalence -In circumstances where the appointing authority has not objected to the qualifications of the candidates and there is no apparent or glaring difference in the qualifications, courts have no reason to interfere and set-aside the appointments made after due consideration. It is the appointing authority which

Public Appointments

State Of Odisha vs Dilip Kumar Mohapatra 2024 INSC 954 - Public Appointments - Article 14 Constitution

Public appointments - Even if in some cases appointments have been made by mistake, or wrongly, that does not confer any right on another person.(Para 20) Constitution of India -Article 14- Article 14 does not envisage negative equality, and if the State committed the mistake, it cannot be forced