Section 37 Arbitration Act - CaseCiter

CaseCiter

Sign in Subscribe

Section 37 Arbitration Act

A collection of 11 posts

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Home Care Retails Marts Pvt. Ltd. v. Haresh N. Sanghavi 2026 INSC 415 - S.9 Arbitration Act- Unsuccessful Party

whether a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ) at the post-award stage, by a party that has lost in the arbitral proceedings and has no enforceable award in its favour, is maintainable in law?

Jan De Nul Dredging India Pvt. Ltd. v. Tuticorin Port Trust; 2026 INSC 34 - Ss.34,37 Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Jan De Nul Dredging India Pvt. Ltd. v. Tuticorin Port Trust; 2026 INSC 34 - Ss.34,37 Arbitration Act

Read Judgment In LawLens Note You can read our notes on this judgment in our Supreme Court Daily Digests. If you are our subscriber, you should get it in our Whatsapp CaseCiter Community at about 9pm on every working day. If you are not our subscriber yet, you can register

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation v. GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd. 2025 INSC 1171 - Natural Justice - S.34 Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996- Section 34,18 - Audi alteram partem as a fundamental juristic principle- When a party is unable to analyse, comment or argue on a contention raised by the other party, it will certainly be deemed as a breach of natural justice and thereby, also a

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Kal Airways Private Limited vs Spicejet Limited 2025 INSC 885 - S.37 Arbitration Act - Condonation Of Delay

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 37 - While dismissing SLP against HC order which refused to condone delay in re-filing appeal under Section 37, SC observed: The Division Bench was of the view that considering the conduct of the petitioners, an inference could be drawn that the petitioners

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Gayatri Balasamy vs ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited 2025 INSC 605 - Arbitration Act - Courts' Power To Modify Awards

❓Whether the powers of the Court under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 will include the power to modify an arbitral award? Majority Judgment (4:1) - Court has a limited power under Sections 34 and 37 of the 1996 Act to modify the arbitral

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

Larsen And Toubro Limited vs Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd. 2025 INSC 523 -Ss.34.37 Arbitration Act - Time Limit On Oral Submissions

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 34,37- Lawyers' tendency to argue as if these proceedings were regular appeals - They must show restraint - The high monetary stakes involved in the proceedings should not result in unnecessarily long oral submissions or bulky written submissions. All this results

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

AC Chokshi Share Broker Private Limited vs Jatin Pratap Desai 2025 INSC 174- Ss 16,34,37 Arbitration Act - BSE Bylaws

Arbitration and Conciliation Act -Section 16,34 - When the jurisdictional issue has not been raised in accordance with Section 16, it is deemed that the objecting party has waived his right, in terms of Section 4, to raise the same at a later stage. Such objection cannot be raised

2025 INSC 138 C & C Constructions Ltd. vs IRCON International Ltd - S 37 Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

2025 INSC 138 C & C Constructions Ltd. vs IRCON International Ltd - S 37 Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 37 - Scope of interference in an appeal - Quoted from Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Company v. Union of India: In appeal, Section 37 of the Act grants narrower scope to the appellate court to review the findings in an award, if

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

2025 INSC 113 Somdatt Builders –NCC – NEC(JV) vs National Highways Authority Of India 2025 INSC 113 - Ss 34,37 Arbitration Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 34 - a great deal of restraint is required to be shown while examining the validity of an arbitral award when such an award has been upheld, wholly or substantially, under Section 34 of the 1996 Act- Frequent interference with arbitral awards would defeat

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

S. Jayalakshmi vs Special District Revenue Officer - Ss 34,37 Arbitration Act - Modification Of Award

Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Section 34,37 - While exercising jurisdiction under Section 34 and 37, courts cannot modify an arbitral award - Referred to Project Director, National Highways No. 45 E and 220, National Highways Authority of India vs. M. Hakeem (2021) 9 SCC 1. S. Jayalakshmi vs

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

United India Insurance Company Limited Odisha Hydra Power Corporation Ltd - Remedy Against Dismissal Of Arbitration Appeal

Constitution of India - Article 136,226,227 ; Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 34,37 - SLP filed against order in Arbitration Appeal filed by District Judge -SC held: When an arbitral award is confirmed in a petition under Section 34 and in an appeal under Section 37